Lift Out section

Since I now have the layout connected in a continuous loop, one of the things I don't like is bending down or ducking under for access.  If something is annoying me or I just don't like, it moves to the top of the to-do list immediately, and hence I spent the last two days working on a lift-out section.

Unfortunately, one side of the duck-under is the entry/exit to/from staging and this is on a curved section, with about six tracks.   The other end is not so bad as it is pretty much straight.  The job took me longer than I thought as I also wanted to isolate a section of track just before the lift-out section and to do this I had to isolate six tracks from staging and the other side of the lift-out section.  I used a common push button, so that when the lift-out section is in place, the push-buttons are in a depressed state allowing current to flow to complete the circuit.  I found this idea on the net sometime back so credit to that person.  Unfortunately I didn't keep the link.

Craig was kind enough to lend me his cutting tool to quickly cut the rails as well as some spare copper plates.

For now I used the standard 1200 x 600 x 12mm ply which is not too difficult to lift out and used some nails for positioning.  I will need to look at some other mechinism for aliging the lift-out section, one thought that comes to mind is a latch or something similar.

With temps hitting 45C in the shed, I had my work cut out for me, although I would prefer a hot day over a rainy and wet one!

The real test of this will be the next 12 months, with rain and humidity, and winter time where temperatures in the shed can go down to 4C.

So far the trains run through pretty well and it's so nice just to walk in without having to bend.  Alot of effort but it should be worth it.

Some photos:

Some sound suggestions....

Some sound suggestions from fellow VR modeller Anthony has got me back on the layout with renewed interest!  One suggestion was to have the main line on the far side of the operator.  By just making this change, the approach looks so much better.  Anthony was also kind enough to drop in and discuss layout modifications.  Another excellent suggestion was to have the industries, which are located on the "wings", to come off road 2, hence not fouling the main line, just like VR prototype practice.
And a final suggestion was to go back to having a continuous run, which facilitates having only one staging yard, rather than two.  This also enables me to run trains continuously whilst I am doing odd jobs or when visitors come over.

Yesterday I purchased another 1200 x 600 x 12mm ply which will be used for a lift out section as I dislike bending all the time to get into the layout.  Will need to work on this another time.

So the layout now looks like this:

Layout dropped back to four roads from five, with the main line on the far side.

Goods Shed road nearest to the operator

I like the space between the running lines and the secondary lines

Station long enough to hold four pass cars and a B Class loco

This road leads to the cattle siding, from road 2.

The peninsula - another industry can be modelled here.

Staging on the opposite side

Approach to town, with an industry on the left.

Approach signal and industry on the right

I really want to add some greenery and vertical structures, like a station building to make things look less flat.  Hopefully this will be achieved in 2014.

Peter's Place..........

A few weeks back we had the opportunity to visit a layout in Mt Gravatt.  The layout is simply stunning scenery wise and some scenes reminded my of the Border Ranges!  The layout is NSW themed and although not finished, it just looked amazing.  Here are some videos:

As 2013 Draws to a Close.............

.
..Well it's nearly the years end and I still find myself unconvinced of the layout I have created so far.  The past few days I have come to the realisation that what I would like to have in relation to a layout is not what can realistically be be achieved with the space I have.  There is too much compression which to me looks unrealistic.  I think for the new year I will concentrate on seeing what I can realistically achieve with the space I have.

Any of the VR major towns such as Dimboola and Horsham, which I tried to model, involves to much compression for my liking.
Photo's below show the problem I see as of too much "compression":

One thing I learnt is that I like to see trains running, like being a railfan track-side, so the idea of depicting one of the smaller towns, such as Gordon, Jung, Dooen, or Buangor, having three or four roads max, with enough space to add some atmosphere, may be a better alternate.  Being on the Western Main line, I can realistically run quite a number of freights, and have the off Roadside pull up, and I really enjoy seeing trains cross in loops.  What I would like and what I can realistically achieve is on either side of the spectrum.

Here are some photos of the locations mentioned from Mark Bau's wonderful site, all small and lovely looking places:

http://www.victorianrailways.net/photogallery/westsou/gordon/gordon.html
http://www.victorianrailways.net/photogallery/westsou/jung/jung.html
http://www.victorianrailways.net/photogallery/westsou/dooen/dooen.html
http://www.victorianrailways.net/photogallery/westsou/buangor/buangor.html

Some others:
http://www.victorianrailways.net/photogallery/westsou/trawalla/trawalla.html
http://www.victorianrailways.net/photogallery/westsou/avoca/avoca.html
http://www.victorianrailways.net/photogallery/westsou/wal_wal/walwal.html

Lets see how the new year pans out....

Love to hear your thoughts...reply below....